About Lyndon Pryor

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Lyndon Pryor has created 965 blog entries.

Masks will be required for all JCPS students this fall, regardless of vaccine status

By |2021-07-27T21:22:56-04:00July 27th, 2021|COVID-19|

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — Masks will be required for all Jefferson County Public Schools students, regardless of their vaccination status, when classes begin next month. Citing rising COVID-19 cases and potential issues enforcing a selective policy, school board members unanimously voted Tuesday night to implement a universal mask requirement. Board member Linda Duncan had a family emergency and was absent from the vote. All students, staff and visitors will be required to wear a mask while inside JCPS properties and school buses. Masks are not being required outside. JCPS Superintendent Marty Pollio announced he would recommend a universal mask requirement to the board Monday, a little over an hour after Gov. Andy Beshear asked school districts to consider such a policy to limit interruptions to in-person instruction. Interested in education? Sign up for our education newsletter The Hall Pass.A few hours before Tuesday's vote, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued new guidance recommending that anyone inside K-12 schools wear a mask, regardless of their vaccination status. The CDC guidance also said fully vaccinated people in areas with "substantial and high transmission" of COVID-19 — like Louisville — should mask up while indoors. Several in the crowd at Central High School, Pollio and a majority of school board members donned masks ahead of the vote.Pollio told reporters Tuesday morning it would be "nearly impossible" to track vaccination statuses to enforce a more selective policy in a district with around 97,000 kids. Around half of JCPS students are not old enough to get the COVID-19 vaccine, which is only available to those 12 and older. More: What is next for Jefferson County Public Schools? Marty Pollio weighs in Unvaccinated people make up the vast majority of COVID-19 infections, state officials said, and are "driving" a "significant surge" of the more contagious delta variant. Masks, including those for the vaccinated, can help reduce the impact of quarantines, Pollio said. Widescale staff quarantines pose "a real threat" to keeping kids in school, he said.JCPS' reopening strategy says fully vaccinated people considered to be a close contact to a positive COVID-19 case won't need to quarantine if they do not have symptoms. Prior to the school board's vote, a few people told the board during public comment that they supported a universal mask policy. It is one way to help get kids back into classrooms, one parent said, and keep them safe.A majority of those who spoke about COVID-19 appeared to oppose the proposed mask requirement. Wearing a mask, some of them argued, should be a choice.Related: Armed man charged with threatening Pollio over summer mask requirementOthers derided the research behind the recommendation, with some sharing conspiracy theories and misinformation about COVID-19. One person demanded an end to "medical tyranny." Several in the crowd jeered and laughed at those in favor of COVID-19 mitigation strategies."I would never use the word 'only' as a modifier when talking about the death of a child," Terrance Sullivan, the executive director of Commission on Human Rights, told the board after some speakers used low child death rates to oppose masks.Later in the evening, board member Corrie Shull encouraged parents to “be good neighbors and ask your children to do the same.”Pollio said that his recommendation follows guidance from health officials, including state health guidance and the American Academy of Pediatrics. As Pollio read research on the impact of masks, the crowd began to boo, briefly drowning out Pollio. Kids haven't struggled with mask requirements during hybrid learning in the spring and summer programs, Pollio said Tuesday morning: "Our kids have been great." Additional mitigation strategies in place for the start of school mirror efforts from the spring:Practice social distancing of at least three feet as often as possibleUse seating charts for easier contact tracingTeach proper handwashing practices Provide masks and hand sanitizer.JCPS begins classes on Aug. 11. This story may be updated. Staff writer Ayana Archie contributed to this report. Reach Olivia Krauth at okrauth@courierjournal.com and on Twitter at @oliviakrauth. 

JCPS board approves universal masking policy for 2021-22 school year

By |2021-07-27T21:22:58-04:00July 27th, 2021|COVID-19|

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WDRB) -- Jefferson County Public Schools students and staff will need to wear masks to begin the school year regardless of their COVID-19 vaccination status.The Jefferson County Board of Education voted 6-0 on the new requirement for the 2021-22 school year, which begins Aug. 11, during a Tuesday board meeting. Board member Linda Duncan, who represents District 5, did not attend the meeting.The vote followed passionate remarks from supporters and opponents of the district's proposed masking policy, which drew raucous cheers and jeers from a crowd of about 200 people gathered at Central High School.JCPS Superintendent Marty Pollio recommended the directive Monday, the same day Gov. Andy Beshear urged schools to consider universal masking policies and, at minimum, require unvaccinated people to wear masks inside school buildings."With the number of COVID cases growing and the potential for mass quarantines, that is the issue here," Pollio said. "The number of staff and students that we will have to quarantine if we do not take every step, our only hope of staying in school is that we implemented every mitigation strategy possible so our students stay in school.""We must do everything to keep our students in school and to let them learn," he said.The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revised its guidance Tuesday to recommend masks for everyone inside schools regardless of their vaccination status.Other school districts are grappling with masking policies as the beginning of the 2021-22 school year approaches, the third academic year held during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some have made masks optional for students and staff.Most JCPS board members expressed support for a universal masking policy ahead of Tuesday’s board meeting, which drew praise and condemnation from families before the decision had even been made.The audience at Tuesday's board meeting thinned by about half after Tuesday's public comment period, the board's first in more than a year because of restrictions in place during the COVID-19 pandemic.The board also approved a virtual learning option for elementary students. The board previously authorized a virtual academy for middle and high school students.This story will be updated.Copyright 2021 WDRB Media. All Rights Reserved.

Top Wisconsin Republican doubts value of another election audit

By |2021-07-27T21:23:17-04:00July 27th, 2021|Election 2020|

A top Wisconsin Republican pushed back on a colleague’s promise for a “cyberforensic examination” of voting equipment used during the 2020 election, setting the stage for another rift between the GOP official and former President Donald Trump.Assembly Speaker Robin Vos cast doubt on whether an inquiry pledged on Monday by state Rep. Janel Brandtjen, who chairs the chamber’s elections committee, would yield anything of value beyond the two separate investigations already looking into the 2020 election in Wisconsin.“Certainly, if she wants to add extra resources from her two staff people in the office to be able to assist the investigators that we have ... we welcome everybody to offer whatever evidence that they have,” Vos said Tuesday. “But as far as her launching her own investigation, I don’t know what that would prove.”LAWSUIT CHALLENGES WISCONSIN'S USE OF BALLOT DROP BOXESBrandtjen asserted on Monday that voters want a closer look at the 2020 election, similar to the controversial forensic audit underway in Arizona and the one being sought by a Pennsylvania state lawmaker.“Voters have made it clear that they want a thorough, cyberforensic examination of tabulators, ballot marking devices, and other election equipment, which I will be helping facilitate,” Brandtjen said. “IP addresses, chain of custody on ballots, and audit trail logs must be thoroughly inspected by cyber audit technicians in order to provide confidence for voters in our elections, both completed and upcoming.”The investigators Vos referred to are part of two teams already looking into the 2020 election in Wisconsin. Republicans in February ordered the state’s nonpartisan Legislative Audit Bureau to review whether the state’s elections commission and municipal clerks followed Wisconsin election laws in 2020 and to examine whether electronic voting machines were used properly.Vos also hired a group of three retired police officers, along with a former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice, to conduct a separate investigation into the election.Vos's role in those inquiries has not satisfied Trump, who strongly supports the Arizona audit and has advocated the initiation of others.Trump lashed out at Vos and other Republican leaders in June, accusing them of standing in the way of an in-depth look at the election in Wisconsin, which Trump lost to President Joe Biden by more than 20,000 votes after having won the state in 2016.“They are actively trying to prevent a Forensic Audit of the election results, especially those which took place in Milwaukee, one of the most corrupt election locales in the country,” Trump said in a June 25 statement.CLICK HERE TO READ MORE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINERVos's comments Tuesday addressed Brandtjen's pledge for a new forensic audit and took on Trump's criticism.“We’re already doing the forensic audit,” Vos said. “So just like, perhaps, President Trump was misinformed about what we’re actually doing in Wisconsin, I feel like my colleague Rep. Brandtjen is misinformed about what we’re doing in Wisconsin because we’re already doing a forensic audit."Washington Examiner VideosTags: News, Wisconsin, 2020 Elections, State Legislatures, Republicans, Donald Trump, Election FraudOriginal Author: Jeremy BeamanOriginal Location: Top Wisconsin Republican doubts value of another election audit

Myanmar Junta on Path of 'Total Self-Destruction' After Annulment of 2020 Election: Observers

By |2021-07-27T20:22:48-04:00July 27th, 2021|Election 2020|

Myanmar’s junta has chosen a path of “total self-destruction” by disregarding the will of the people in a bid to legitimize its power grab, an official with the deposed National League for Democracy (NLD) said Tuesday, in response to an announcement annulling the country’s 2020 election results. Late on Monday, the military-appointed Union Election Commission (UEC) said it had thrown out the tally from Myanmar’s Nov. 8 poll, which was won in a landslide by Aung San Suu Kyi’s NLD party, claiming that more than 11.3 million ballots—representing nearly one-third of the country’s registered voters—had been discounted due to fraud and other irregularities. Among alleged irregularities, the commission said the NLD government had assigned members of the UEC sub-commission at Myanmar’s state and regional levels, election authorities allowed voters to cast ballots without presenting their national identification cards, voters cast multiple ballots under the same name, and the NLD election victory committee members were part of a commission in charge of gathering early ballots. The announcement was quickly rejected by several of Myanmar’s political parties, who argued that it ignores the will of both the country’s 37 million registered voters and the candidates who they say won in a free and fair election.  Candidates from 10 political parties won parliamentary seats in the 2020 election, although the NLD party took the clear majority with 396 of 664 seats in the bicameral legislature. On Tuesday, Aung Kyi Nyunt, a member of the NLD’s Central Executive Committee who won a seat in the Amyothar Hluttaw (National Assembly) from Magwe region’s No. 6 constituency, called the decision to annul the election results a “violation” of the country’s 2008 constitution, drafted by the then-ruling junta government under Snr. Gen. Than Shwe. “Firstly, an election body appointed by the [junta] cannot simply reject the results like this. Secondly, the will of the people cannot be annulled through an order based on the decision of one group of people on a piece of paper. And thirdly, we have no reason to recognize an election commission formed by an illegitimate government,” he said. “We firmly believe that this statement is not legally binding or democratically viable.” Aung Kyi Nyunt said the junta had committed itself to a path of “total self-destruction,” devoid of popular support, by choosing to annul the ballot results and ignore the will of the people. Myanmar’s military seized power on Feb. 1 in a coup d’état, arresting former State Counselor Aung San Suu Kyi and other top members of the NLD leadership. Three weeks after the coup, the UEC convened a meeting with the country’s political parties, informing them that the 2020 election results would be annulled and that the NLD would likely be disbanded for rigging the vote. The junta has provided no evidence to back up its claims of voter fraud and has violently responded to widespread protests, killing 934 people and arresting 5,382, according to the Bangkok-based Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (AAPP). Protesters march in Yangon to demand an end to military rule on the anniversary of a 1962 massacre of students by Myanmar's military, July 7, 2021. RFA ‘No more confidence’ On Tuesday, Aye Thida Myint, the chairwoman of the Lahu National Development Party (LNDP), who won a state seat in last year’s ballot, said the annulment marked a new low for the junta. “The cancellation of the results means that everything we did for the elections, all of our efforts, have gone down the drain,” she said. “After all this, even if new elections are to be held, we’ll have no more confidence in the current political situation. The annulment has destroyed the goals and aspirations of the people. This is totally unacceptable to us.” Thar Tun Hla, the chairman of the Rakhine National Party (ANP) who won a seat in the 2020 election, said the military may have scrapped the election results in response to claims by parliament’s Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Committee of Representatives (CRPH) and the shadow National Unity Government (NUG) that they represent the interests of the people. “The annulment of the election results could be a move to refute the claim by CRPH and NUG that they represent the people’s will and that they have a mandate,” he said. In 2020, the ANP won four seats in the Pyithu Hluttaw, or Lower House, and four seats in the National Assembly, as well as 15 seats in seven state and regional assemblies. Attempts by RFA to contact Dr. Nandar Hla Myint, the spokesperson of the military proxy Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), which won 71 seats in the 2020 election, went unanswered Tuesday. The USDP, made up of retired army officers, refused to accept the results of the 2020 elections and its calls for a new vote set the stage for the military coup. The junta has said it will hold another ballot in a year. Uniting the opposition Political analyst Than Soe Naing slammed the junta’s decision to annul the election results at a time when the international community is calling for the return of power to the civilian NLD government. “This goes against the real will of the people,” he said. “It’s part of a process that seeks to justify a dishonorable coup … But we’re seeing that not even the parties which supported [the military] politically can accept this move.” Aung Htoo, a Sweden-based Burmese lawyer, also criticized the annulment of the internationally recognized election results and suggested it would lead to the downfall of the junta. “It will never be possible to have a federal democracy and a lasting peace under the leadership of the military regime,” he said. “This decision will push the ethnic forces, the pro-democracy forces and the people as a whole to join forces in fighting against the military to achieve their goal of peace.” Reported by RFA’s Myanmar Service. Translated by Khin Maung Nyane. Written in English by Joshua Lipes.

Fann demands records on audit from Hobbs

By |2021-07-27T21:23:19-04:00July 27th, 2021|Election 2020|

From left are Katie Hobbs and Karen Fann In a sign the Senate audit, which was supposed to be only about the 2020 election results, is now expanding in scope, Senate President Karen Fann now wants documents from Secretary of State Katie Hobbs. In a public records request, the Prescott Republican is demanding any communications Hobbs has had with anyone about the audit and the litigation it has produced. And Fann is casting a wide net, seeking not just messages with federal, state and local officials but also political parties, volunteers, consultants, vendors, formal or informal advisors, fundraisers and the media. “I can’t disclose what we’re looking for at this time,” Fann told Capitol Media Services, including how any of what she wants fits into the Senate’s need to investigate the election conduct and results as part of its duties to review existing laws and craft new ones. The move comes as Hobbs, a Democrat, has publicly accused the auditors of “making it up as they go along,” and saying she has no confidence in whatever is produced by Cyber Ninjas, the firm Fann hired to conduct the review. For the moment, Hobbs aide Murphy Hebert said her boss, is reviewing the request. “At this point it appears to be the kind of nebulous fishing expedition that we’ve come to expect from the Senate president,” she said. And Hebert called it “ironic” that this comes even as Fann has hired outside counsel to fight requests for public records about the audit, “including who’s actually funding the partisan ballot review.” The development comes as former Secretary of State Ken Bennett, who was Fann’s initial choice as her liaison with Cyber Ninjas, said he has been locked out of the Veterans Memorial Coliseum over a dispute about information he provided to outsiders. Meanwhile, Randy Pullen, whom Fann also tapped to work with the auditors, said the final counting of the ballots was completed Tuesday. He said they are being packed up for return to Maricopa County. Pullen said a report on the audit could be prepared by the middle of August. But all that depends on what new information is obtained from the county. And that goes to Fann’s separate decision to now issue new — and long expected — subpoenas to the county supervisors for items that Cyber Ninjas contends is necessary for it to complete its work. Here, too, the scope is broad, ranging from envelopes in which early ballots were received to passwords, security keys or tokens to access the ballot tabulation devices. And then there’s the demand for the county’s routers, the devices that show traffic between computers as well as any links to the internet. All that goes to the contention by the auditors that the county’s election system had somehow been compromised or hacked. That follows reports that the county’s voter registration system had been breached. The issue of those routers — and what those who question the fact that Joe Biden won the state’s 11 electoral votes — has become so heated that former President Trump commented on it during the rally this past weekend in Phoenix, telling senators they must pursue that demand. County officials say the election equipment itself was never connected to the internet, citing their own audit which they say confirms that fact. But the fight goes beyond that, to the claim by Sheriff Paul Penzone that giving outsiders access to the routers could compromise law enforcement because it provides a road map of everyone communicating with anyone else in the county. The subpoena also wants up-to-date voter records along with notations of any changes made. That goes to allegations by Cyber Ninjas that there is evidence some people were permitted to vote who had not registered by the deadline. County spokesman Fields Moseley said any response will have to wait until the supervisors meet and consult with their legal counsel. But he said the supervisors believe “the county has already provided everything competent auditors would need to confirm the accuracy and security of the 2020 election,” a slap at Cyber Ninjas which has never performed this kind of audit before. And Jack Sellers, who chairs the board, already has made his feelings quite apparent. “I want to make it clear: I will not be responding to any more requests from this sham process,” he said in May. The board is set to meet Wednesday. They don’t have a lot of time to respond: Fann has demanded that everything they want be produced at the Senate at 1 p.m. Monday. That’s also the same deadline Fann set for Dominion Voting Systems, from who the county leases the counting equipment, to produce all the passwords necessary “for all levels of access, including, but not limited to, administrator access.” County officials, who have also been asked for that information, say they can’t produce what they don’t have. Dominion is making it clear it intends to fight. “Releasing Dominion’s intellectual property to an unaccredited, biased, and plainly unreliable actor such as Cyber Ninjas would be reckless, causing irreperable damage to the commercial interests of the company and the election security of the country,” a spokeswoman said in a prepared comment. “No company should be compelled to participate in such an irresponsible act.” All this could pave the way for a new round of litigation about the extent of the ability of Fann to demand whatever she says is necessary for the Senate to investigate the 2020 election. Strictly speaking, Fann does not have the necessary 16 votes in the Senate to hold the supervisors — or anyone — in contempt for failing to comply with the subpoenas. Sen. Paul Boyer, R-Glendale, balked at an earlier contempt vote. And since that time, Sen. Michelle Ugenti-Rita, R-Scottsdale, initially a supporter of the audit said she has become soured on what has happened. “Sadly, it’s now become clear that the audit has been botched,” she wrote in a Twitter post. “The total lack of competence by Karen Fann over the last five months has deprived the voters of Arizona a comprehensive accounting of the 2020 election.” But just because the Senate can’t hold anyone in contempt does not leave Fann powerless. The last time the supervisors sought to fight a subpoena they lost. Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Timothy Thomasson said that Fann,, as Senate president, has broad powers to issue subpoenas for anything related to a legitimate legislative purpose. And he said the Senate is entitled to review the election results to determine whether changes are needed in election laws. More to the point, the judge said there is no requirement for a majority of the Senate to approve issuance of a subpoena.

U of L adding fan experience upgrades at Cardinal Stadium ahead of full-capacity return

By |2021-07-27T21:22:59-04:00July 27th, 2021|COVID-19|

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WDRB) -- Fans will notice some upgrades to Cardinal Stadium as they hopefully return to football games this fall.The University of Louisville is adding a few features in an around the stadium to increase fan experience at games an events, including a new fan zone, boosted WiFi and a digital monitor for a Ring of Honor.“I think fans will be excited with what they see,” U of L Athletic Director Vince Tyra said Tuesday as he announced the upgrades.The Alley is a fan tailgating zone being constructed near Boxley Avenue off of Floyd Street. It will feature a turf area for tailgating games, food and drink vendors, live music and an indoor VIP area. Buffalo Construction is working on the project. The company donated more than $800,000 worth of services for the project.It will be open by kickoff of the first game against Eastern Kentucky University."We're trying to invest in our fans and give them a tailgating experience like they haven't had before," Tyra said. "It's a tradition that we need to create. It's not going to happen on its own."A Ring of Honor is also in the works for Cardinal Stadium. U of L will install a 450-foot-long digital monitor to honor former players and bowl appearances.But Tyra said those projects won't be finish by the start of the season because of a materials shortage causing a delay."That'll happen during the season but will get done," Tyra said. "We'd love to see things get shipped overseas quicker, but we're at the mercy of logistics today."The stadium will be back to 100% capacity for the start of football season. However, U of L officials are prepared for that to change given the threat of the COVID-19 Delta variant."My guess is it's going to be fluid from here to there," Tyra said. "I'm sure a lot of last year's policies are going to pull forward on that."U of L Athletics is in communication with the Atlantic Coast Conference Medical Advisory Group about policies and the changing landscape of the pandemic. Officials said they're also adhering to the rules and regulations of state governors.As of now, the university feels confident in bringing fans to a packed stadium. Tyra is anxious to see if fans are willing to come. Cardinal Stadium at the University of Louisville on Sept. 9, 2020. Eric Crawford photo. "I mean, I think that's the bigger question," he said. "Do the fans feel any different about coming to the stadium rather than the plan we have for them to be here safely?"With the recent announcement of the Louisville Metro Police Department scaling back its staffing for events, U of L acknowledges it could be without LMPD's assistance for home football games."We've got contingency plans in place to work with other police departments to have right at 100 staff that will be covered to make sure we have traffic flow and the normal security we have in the stadium," Tyra said.U of L is preparing for the Cardinal Stadium that fans are used to and is hopeful the necessary upgrades pave the way for the future."Today, we're talking about something that's really on behalf of our fans and creating a tradition we believe will stick for a long, long time," Tyra said.Copyright 2021 WDRB Media. All Rights Reserved.

Secretary of State Benson: State auditors want to 'recreate' election reviews

By |2021-07-27T19:20:32-04:00July 27th, 2021|Election 2020|

Lansing — Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson has asked Attorney General Dana Nessel to determine whether state auditors have the power to obtain local election records amid lingering claims about the 2020 vote.In a July 12 letter that was uncovered by FOIA Services Michigan, Benson told Nessel that employees of the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) want "to recreate the audits conducted by the county clerks." The leader of the auditor general's office was appointed by the GOP-controlled Michigan Legislature and the office is housed in the legislative branch, but it acts as an autonomous agency.The revelation of the ongoing auditor general probe and Benson's concerns about it come as some Republican lawmakers in the battleground state have pressed for a new audit of the 2020 results. Former President Donald Trump also continues to levy unsubstantiated claims of fraud."Were the OAG to come to an audit result different from county clerks because of these inherent practical challenges, such an outcome would ... feed the many baseless false, fabricated and misleading claims involving the November 2020 election," Benson wrote in her letter to Nessel.So far, many GOP legislators in Michigan have resisted calls for another statewide review of the vote, like what's taking place in Arizona, but some have said they could change their minds if new evidence comes to light.Both Benson and Nessel are Democrats. In November, Trump lost Michigan to Democrat Joe Biden by 154,000 votes or 3 percentage points. Despite unproven claims of wrongdoing in the election, a series of court rulings, dozens of reviews by election officials and bipartisan boards of canvassers as well as an investigation by state Senate Republicans have reinforced the outcome.More than 250 election audits have already been completed in Michigan, Benson's office said in March.According to the Office of the Auditor General, it's currently examining the sufficiency of "post-election review procedures" and efforts to provide training for local election officials. The audit had been planned for the non-election year, office spokeswoman Kelly Miller said.In March, state Rep. Julie Alexander, R-Hanover, asked the office to review Michigan's "election processes to help ensure their security and accuracy." Among her requests was for the office to consider "the process involved in the statewide risk-limiting audit that was conducted after the general election."The Michigan Bureau of Elections argues that the state auditors' interest in "recreating audits" is well-intentioned but "fears that the outcome will become another avenue to cast doubt upon and re-litigate the outcome of the November election," Benson said in her letter to Nessel.Benson asked Nessel, the state's top law enforcement official, to determine whether employees of the Office of the Auditor General can physically handle election records without violating laws that give the power to manage the records to election officials.The secretary of state also asked Nessel to decide whether the Office of the Auditor General, which usually examines the work of state agencies, has the power to request the election records from local governments.Benson's spokeswoman Tracy Wimmer said state election officials are concerned whether the state auditors will be able to replicate the processes carried out by election clerks."The OAG has said it wants to audit the post-election audits carried out by local township, city and county election officials," Wimmer said. "As these local officials aren’t a part of state government, it’s quite possible that for the state to audit them would not just be government overreach, it would be illegal under our state constitution."For this reason, we asked the attorney general for an opinion on how the law applies in this situation."According to Benson's letter to Nessel, the Office of the Auditor General wants to review a "significant volume of local election records, including poll books and other polling place records, public notices issued and records of testing conducted."It will be "logistically difficult to ensure that all records are organized and preserved in the exact same format as was the case during the audit," Benson wrote of the initial previously conducted reviews."Any damage, misplacement, or difficulty in retrieving public records could lead to a different audit result, which might be attributable to local record storage and retention issues rather than audit deficiencies or audit guidance provided by BOE (Bureau of Elections)," she added.Office of the Auditor General personnel attended a pilot risk-limiting audit conducted in Holland in May, according to Benson's letter. Personnel also attended a procedural audit conducted by the Ottawa County clerk's office and a procedural audit conducted in Kent County.Benson's letter is still under review, Nessel's spokeswoman Lynsey Mukomel said Tuesday.cmauger@detroitnews.comStaff Writer Beth LeBlanc contributed.

No evidence for viral claim that '22 million illegal aliens' are 'voting illegally'

By |2021-07-27T19:20:36-04:00July 27th, 2021|Election 2020|

PolitiFact | No evidence for viral claim that ‘22 million illegal aliens’ are ‘voting illegally’ Stand up for the facts! Misinformation isn't going away just because it's a new year. Support trusted, factual information with a tax deductible contribution to PolitiFact. More Info I would like to contribute There are “22 million illegal aliens living in America and ... voting illegally.” Chester County election workers process mail-in and absentee ballots for the 2020 general election at West Chester University in West Chester, Pa., on Nov. 4, 2020. (AP) No evidence for viral claim that ‘22 million illegal aliens’ are ‘voting illegally’ If Your Time is short Many reliable entities such as the Pew Research Center estimate that there are in the ballpark of 11 million people living illegally in the U.S. One 2018 study from Yale put the number closer to 22 million, but the study has been subject to criticism. There is no evidence that 22 million people in the U.S. without legal permission voted illegally in the 2020 election or regularly vote in American elections. Social media users on Facebook and Instagram are sharing a years-old image that wrongly claims 22 million people are not only living in the U.S. illegally, but voting in elections. "I’ll tell you what a constitutional crisis is: 22 million illegal aliens living in America and using benefits they never contributed to and voting illegally," the text over the image says. The image was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)  The image, which appeared on Facebook as early as April 2019, is circulating as supporters of former President Donald Trump continue to promote the false narrative that the 2020 election was stolen from him. But the claims in the image have always been inaccurate. There is no evidence that 22 million immigrants regularly vote in American elections despite living in the country without legal permission, or that they did so in 2020. In fact, it’s not clear that there are even that many people living in the country illegally to begin with. "There is no evidence that there are 22 million immigrants in the U.S. voting illegally, either in 2020 or at any time," said Lorraine Minnite, an associate professor of public policy at Rutgers University in Camden. "The claim is preposterous." A screenshot shows the viral image circulating on Facebook and Instagram as it appeared July 27, 2021. No evidence of widespread fraud President Joe Biden won more votes than Trump in what local, state and federal officials affirmed was a free and fair election absent of the widespread fraud Trump claimed.  Judges across the country rejected dozens of lawsuits seeking to overturn the election, in many cases because the allegations of fraud came without the proof needed to back them up. The image claiming 22 million immigrants are living and voting illegally similarly lacks proof.  "One would think that such claims of historic subversion in our democracy would be backed up by the receipts to prove them," said Matthew Weil, director of the elections project at the Bipartisan Policy Center. "There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud at any level."  Federal law requires citizenship to vote in national elections, and would-be voters sign a form attesting under penalty of perjury that they are citizens when they register to do so. As PolitiFact has reported, states can check various databases to verify voters’ citizenship status. "Election officials spend the weeks before and after Election Day constantly reconciling voter rolls and ballot totals to ensure that only eligible Americans cast ballots," Weil said. He added that cases of fraudulent voting are rare in any year and often the result of misunderstandings. Minnite, who wrote a book about "The Myth of Voter Fraud," said the most common problem she has seen in her research on the issue is noncitizens getting accidentally registered to vote when they go to the DMV. But the number of people who fall into this category is "miniscule," she said. In previous years, PolitiFact fact-checked several similar claims from Trump and others — all inaccurate — about immigrants voting illegally in the 2008, 2016 and 2018 elections.  Our reporting pointed to research from several organizations that found voter fraud among noncitizens is not widespread. Experts also told us at the time that fraud on the scale of millions would require months of coordination going undetected by elections officials.  For there to be "22 million" immigrants unlawfully in the U.S. and "voting illegally," as the latest viral image now claims, there would also need to be that many people in the country illegally.  And each and every one of them would have to be casting a ballot. But the one study from 2018 that estimated the population here illegally was around 22.1 million has been criticized by demographers and immigration experts, who said it’s not grounded in empirical research about illegal immigration patterns and overestimates migration from Mexico, among other things, as PolitiFact reported. The Homeland Security Department, Pew Research Center, Center for Migration Studies of New York and Migration Policy Institute have all settled on much lower estimates. "In each case, the organizations have individually developed estimates within a pretty tight range of about 10.5 million to 11.5 million unauthorized immigrants overall in the United States," said Michelle Mittelstadt, communications director for the Migration Policy Institute, a think tank. Finally, immigrant adults living in the country illegally are ineligible for nearly all federal public benefits, with few exceptions, Mittelstadt said. That’s despite the fact that some pay many forms of taxes, including state and local sales taxes and property taxes. Our ruling A viral image says there are "22 million illegal aliens living in America and ... voting illegally." That’s not true. Many reliable entities, including the Homeland Security Department and the Pew Research Center, estimate that there are closer to 11 million people living illegally in the U.S. There’s no evidence that 22 million are regularly voting illegally or did so in 2020. We rate this statement False. Facebook post (archived), April 9, 2019 Facebook post, July 25, 2021 Instagram post (archived), July 24, 2021 Pew Research Center, "Key facts about the changing U.S. unauthorized immigrant population," April 13, 2021 U.S. Department of Homeland Security, "Estimates of the Unauthorized Immigrant Population Residing in the United States: January 2015–January 2018," January 2021 Migration Policy Institute, "Unauthorized Immigrants in the United States: Stable Numbers, Changing Origins," December 2020 The Hill, "Yale, MIT study: 22 million, not 11 million, undocumented immigrants in US," Sept. 21, 2018 PolitiFact, "Pence falsely says if HR 1 passes, millions of people in US illegally will be registered to vote," March 5, 2021 PolitiFact, "Do states verify citizenship of voters in federal elections?" Dec. 7, 2020 PolitiFact, "Fact-checking Trump's claim on cost of illegal immigration, number of immigrants here illegally," Jan. 28, 2019 PolitiFact, "No evidence ‘many’ illegal immigrants voted in midterm elections, as Lou Dobbs said," Nov. 16, 2018 PolitiFact, "Donald Trump Jr. tweets misleading 2012 headline about Florida noncitizen voters," Nov. 13, 2018 PolitiFact, "Donald Trump says there's 'substantial evidence of voter fraud.' There isn't," Jan. 5, 2018 PolitiFact, "Following Trump voter fraud allegations, claim that 5.7 million noncitizens voted is wrong," June 22, 2017 PolitiFact, "Fact-check: Did 3 million undocumented immigrants vote in this year's election?" Nov. 18, 2016 PolitiFact, "Donald Trump's Pants on Fire claim that millions of illegal votes cost him popular vote victory," Nov. 18, 2016 PolitiFact, "Trump wrongfully says immigrants voting illegally won North Carolina for Obama in 2008," Oct. 19, 2016 PolitiFact, "Donald Trump repeats Pants on Fire claim about '30 million' illegal immigrants," Sept. 1, 2016 Email interview with Matthew Weil, director of the elections project at the Bipartisan Policy Center, July 27, 2021 Email interview with Lorraine Minnite, associate professor of public policy at Rutgers University, Camden, July 27, 2021 Email interview with Michelle Mittelstadt, director of communications and public affairs at the Migration Policy Institute, July 26, 2021 In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts. Sign me up

Senate committee endorses massive defense spending bill while defense lobbying spending …

By |2021-07-27T21:23:20-04:00July 27th, 2021|Election 2020|

(Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call) The defense industry spent significantly less on lobbying in the second quarter of 2021, roughly $26 million to the first quarter’s $31 million, but stayed in line with the industry’s lobbying spend in the second quarter of 2020 ($24 million). But the industry’s lobbying spending decrease comes as the Senate Armed Services Committee endorsed a new defense authorization bill that would raise overall defense spending by $37 billion for fiscal year 2022.  The new version of the National Defense Authorization Act, as approved by the committee in a 23-3 vote, would appropriate roughly $777.9 billion for defense programs across departments from the Pentagon to the Energy Department.  The committee’s authorization is a sign of bipartisan support for increased defense spending, even after fiscal year 2021 marked the highest level of defense spending since World War II except for in the early 2010s during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.  Armed Services Committee Chair Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), who received $318,580 in campaign contributions from the defense industry in the 2020 election cycle, said the budget increase “will help safeguard the nation, counter a range of evolving threats, and support our troops both on and off the battlefield.” The defense industry, including PACs and individuals giving $200 or more, spent more than $5.7 million in campaign contributions to members on the Senate Armed Services Committee in the 2020 cycle. Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), the ranking member of the committee, received the most contributions of any other committee member from the industry: $393,733. The second most went to Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) with $326,204.  Defense lobbying under former President Donald Trump averaged around $117 million across all four years. However, lobbying spending did see a significant drop from 2019 to 2020, with only $103.72 million being spent on lobbying expenditures in the last year of Trump’s administration, nearly $8 million less than the previous year.  While lobbying spending has declined, the new budget proposal is more than $25 billion higher than President Joe Biden’s proposal.  Most notably, the Senate Armed Services committee included a provision creating military attorney offices that would be in charge of deciding which felony allegations to prosecute. Those decisions are currently made by senior officers. The provision is an incorporation of legislation proposed by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.).  The committee-endorsed proposal would also force the Pentagon to implement Government Accountability Office recommendations on sexual harassment and assault. Officials have previously agreed to enact them in 2011, but the recommendations haven’t been implemented. The committee also approved an amendment to the bill requiring women to sign up for the military draft and included a 2.7% pay increase for military personnel and Defense Department civilian personnel — a key priority of Biden’s. The bill includes hefty amounts of funding for military vehicles and equipment, including $1.7 billion for an Arleigh Burke class destroyer and a $350 million initial payment for a new amphibious assault ship. It also includes $85 million for a F-35 fighter jet for the Air Force.  While Inhofe said he doesn’t support each provision in the bill, he said he believes it’s an example of bipartisanship. “This is a big win for our national security and sends a strong message to both our allies and adversaries that America is prepared to stand up for ourselves and our friends,” Inhofe said.  “The world we face today is more dangerous than I’ve seen in my lifetime, and our military must be ready to meet any and all challenges we face.” Feel free to distribute or cite this material, but please credit OpenSecrets. For permission to reprint for commercial uses, such as textbooks, contact OpenSecrets: [email protected] Read more OpenSecrets News & Analysis: Campaign finance · Defense · Industries · Lobbying · Lobbying · Lobbyists Support Accountability Journalism At OpenSecrets.org we offer in-depth, money-in-politics stories in the public interest. Whether you’re reading about 2020 presidential fundraising, conflicts of interest or “dark money” influence, we produce this content with a small, but dedicated team. Every donation we receive from users like you goes directly into promoting high-quality data analysis and investigative journalism that you can trust. Please support our work and keep this resource free. Thank you.

The return of Louisville car show excites owners

By |2021-07-27T20:22:33-04:00July 27th, 2021|COVID-19|

{{featured_button_text}} The Last Hot Sunday in July Car Show in Louisville created excitement for car lovers of all ages this past weekend. Hundreds of people came to Cass County to look at a wide variety of vehicles. The car show took place throughout the downtown section of the city. The return of the Last Hot Sunday in July Car Show, canceled last year because of the pandemic, brought a large crowd to downtown Louisville to view an estimated 180 cars, trucks and motorcycles. This 1957 Chevy received admiring glances among the crowd at the Last Hot Sunday in July Car Show in Louisville. The Last Hot Sunday in July Car Show brought out modern vehicles and those from a bygone era. This 1960 Corvette, owned by Randy Kolb of Omaha, won the Mayor's Choice Award at the Last Hot Sunday in July Car Show in Louisville. Not all the vehicles that participated in the Last Hot Sunday in July Car Show had four wheels as evident with this motorcycle with sidecar. This red 1954 Ford F-100 truck made a hot appearance at last Sunday's annual car show in Louisville. Handsome cars from a bygone era were part of the flavor at the Last Hot Sunday in July Car Show in Louisville. Ron Tamez brought his 1972 Dodge Challenger Rally to last Sunday's annual car show in Louisville. This black old-time Thunderbird was a hit at the Last Hot Sunday in July Car Show in Louisville. Hundreds of people came to Louisville this past weekend to look at vehicles parked throughout downtown. This 1950 Mercury, owned by Arlen Ellis of Allen, Neb., won the People's Choice Award at the Last Hot Sunday in July Car Show in Louisville. Arlen Ellis holds the People's Choice Award given to him from Mayor Rod Petersen at the Last Hot Sunday in July Car Show in Louisville. Louisville Mayor Rod Petersen presents the Mayor's Choice Award to Randy Kolb of Omaha at the Last Hot Sunday in July Car Show. Timothy Rohwer LOUISVILLE – A year after COVID-19 put the brakes on Louisville’s annual summer car show, it returned on Sunday in high gear.“It was probably one of the largest participations ever,” said Mayor Rod Petersen.The Last Hot Sunday in July Car Show, as it’s officially known, attracted hot-looking vehicles from near and far, including vehicles from Utah, Texas and North Dakota, as well as 40 from the Louisville area.Altogether, 165 vehicles were registered for the show with a dozen or so more that just showed up for the fun.Car owners appreciated the return of this event.“Car guys love to show off their cars,” said Smitty Schmitz of Louisville. “This is a good turnout.”Schmitz came with his 1972 black Chevy Monte Carlo that he purchased right off the showroom way back when.“I needed a car and I saw this on the showroom and I said, `This will work,’” Schmitz said.Because COVID canceled many car shows last year, he was only to attend four of them, including one he drove 250 miles to, Schmitz said.Sunday’s event was his fifth already this year with more coming, he said.“I’ll do a show every weekend.”Schmitz also has three other cars – a 1923 t-bucket, 1939 Ford two-door sedan and a 1935 Oldsmobile two-door coupe street rod he is building.Meanwhile, across the street, Mike Jensen of Manley, who brought his 1986 off-road vehicle to the event, said he was happy with the turnout.“It’s good to see people come out again and see people smiling.”Ron Tamez came from Bellevue with his 1972 Dodge Challenger Rally that he bought just four months ago.Over the years it was on display in five different car museums and had just 7,000 miles when purchased.“I love it. It’s sure fun to drive,” he said.It’s also fun to see other motorists give him admiring looks about the car, Tamez said.“That’s really cool.”As in the past, awards were handed out for the most popular vehicles.The winner of the People’s Choice Award, voted by the crowd, was Arlen Ellis of Allen, Neb., with his 1950 Mercury.The Mayor’s Choice Award, voted by Petersen, went to Randy Kolb of Omaha for his 1960 Corvette.“I thought this was one of the best car shows here in a long time,” Schmitz said. 0 Comments #pu-email-form-breaking-email-article { clear: both; background-color: #fff; color: #222; background-position: bottom; background-repeat: no-repeat; padding: 15px 20px; margin-bottom: 40px; border-top: 4px solid rgba(0,0,0,.8); border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.2); display: none; } #pu-email-form-breaking-email-article, #pu-email-form-breaking-email-article p { font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; } #pu-email-form-breaking-email-article h1 { font-size: 24px; margin: 15px 0 5px 0; font-family: "serif-ds", Times, "Times New Roman", serif; } #pu-email-form-breaking-email-article .lead { margin-bottom: 5px; } #pu-email-form-breaking-email-article .email-desc { font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 5px; opacity: 0.7; } #pu-email-form-breaking-email-article form { padding: 10px 30px 5px 30px; } #pu-email-form-breaking-email-article .disclaimer { opacity: 0.5; margin-bottom: 0; line-height: 100%; } #pu-email-form-breaking-email-article .disclaimer a { color: #222; text-decoration: underline; } #pu-email-form-breaking-email-article .email-hammer { border-bottom: 3px solid #222; opacity: .5; display: inline-block; padding: 0 10px 5px 10px; margin-bottom: -5px; font-size: 16px; } @media (max-width: 991px) { #pu-email-form-breaking-email-article form { padding: 10px 0 5px 0; } } Get local news delivered to your inbox!

Go to Top